Comments on: Happy twenty-ten! (Not two-thousand-ten.) http://danielgreene.com/2010/01/01/happy-twenty-ten-not-two-thousand-ten/ of interpreting ASL-English, Deaf-Hearing Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:05:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Daniel Greene http://danielgreene.com/2010/01/01/happy-twenty-ten-not-two-thousand-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-525 Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:17:16 +0000 http://danielgreene.com/?p=590#comment-525 Oh, shoot. Of course it is! Now I remember that I was among those who pooh-poohed the celebration of the year 2000 as the beginning of the new millennium because I knew that 2001 was the true start of the millennium. Now I’ve been stupidly carried along by the tide of popular but wrong belief that 2010 is the beginning of a new decade when it’s actually the end of a decade. That’s about as bad as thinking that midnight is the end of a day rather than the beginning of it. (I always say that deadlines should be set at either 11:59 PM or 12:01 AM to avoid this confusion.)

]]> By: Kimberly Hosey http://danielgreene.com/2010/01/01/happy-twenty-ten-not-two-thousand-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-524 Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:43:03 +0000 http://danielgreene.com/?p=590#comment-524 Ha; good point. Happy twenty ten!

Except it’s the last year of a decade, not the first.

Sorry. Couldn’t help it. :-) Happy belated New Year, Daniel.

]]> By: Paula http://danielgreene.com/2010/01/01/happy-twenty-ten-not-two-thousand-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-523 Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:15:48 +0000 http://danielgreene.com/?p=590#comment-523 Yes, I agree. Happy twenty-ten to you!

]]>