Month: September 2010

  • Bullshit from Senator McCain

    Dear Mr. Smithers,

    Thank you for contacting me regarding the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. I appreciate hearing your views on this controversial issue.

    Recently, the Senate Armed Services Committee received testimony from Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and the Service Secretaries on the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, echoing the desire of President Obama to have it repealed by Congress. The committee also heard the personal views of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, several of the combatant commanders, and most recently, the Service Chiefs, who have responsibility for the organization, training, and overall readiness of their forces and for providing their best military advice to the President on matters that might affect their ability to ensure sufficiently trained and ready forces.

    Each of the military’s Service Chiefs has expressed his support for the comprehensive, ten-month policy review of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” that Secretary Gates has directed. However, each has indicated that he is not prepared to support a repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy at this time. Based on their expert testimony, I am urging Congress to await the completion of the Pentagon’s policy review in order to give the Service Chiefs the information they have asked for before any attempt is made to change law. I will strongly oppose any attempt to change the current law based on an incomplete and inadequate review of this policy, and I hope that my fellow Senators will also take this approach in the interest of national security.

    With respect to the review itself, I have expressed my concerns about its focus and scope. Unfortunately, in his testimony earlier this year to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Secretary Gates described the mandate as “a review of the issues associated with properly implementing a repeal of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy.” The guiding question, as Secretary Gates put it, should be “not whether the military prepares to make this change, but how we best prepare for it.” This is consistent with President Obama’s goals, but it seems to get things backwards: The current Pentagon review should be an objective study of the relevant military issues, not an implementation plan.

    The issue that Congress must decide, and the issue the Service Chiefs should be asked to give their best military advice about, is whether the “Don’t Ask Don’t’ Tell” policy should be repealed. We should ask that question to our service personnel and their families at all levels and genuinely consider their views in our debate. Clearly, there are many policy and logistical challenges that would have to be overcome if the law is repealed, but that should not be the primary focus of the ongoing policy review. I will continue to insist that we use the coming months to study not only how to implement a change to the current policy, but also whether and why the men and women of the Armed Forces – the generals, the officers, the NCOs, and the privates – support or oppose such a change. I would then expect the views of the Service Chiefs to incorporate this critically important information.

    I am proud of, and thankful for, every American who chooses to put on the uniform of our nation and serve their country, particularly in this time of war.The “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy is not perfect, but it reflects a compromise achieved with great difficulty that has effectively supported military readiness. However imperfect, the policy has allowed many gay and lesbian Americans to serve their country. I honor their service, I honor their sacrifices, and I honor them. But we should not change the current policy until we are confident – from a military standpoint, with the informed advice of the Service Chiefs – that such a change is consistent with military effectiveness.

    Again, thank you again for writing me on this issue. Feel free to contact me in the future on this or any other matter.

    Sincerely,

    John McCain

    United States Senator

  • Introducing our new doggie girl, Zoey

    We adopted a new dog into our lives. Her name is Zoey, and she’s a small Chihuahua. If a picture tells a thousand words, then eighteen photos of Zoey tells a nice story. And if a picture tells a thousand words, then a movie tells a million. Here’s a million reasons why we love our new girl:

  • Finally selling my stuff on eBay

    I’ve had a bunch of things hanging around for a while that I’ve been meaning to sell. They’re great things; it’s just that I’ve replaced them with even greater things, such the Nexus One I ordered the first day they were available to replace the G1 I had stood in line for an hour before the T-Mobile store opened the first day the G1 was available.

    Speaking of the G1, I’m selling it on eBay, in case you’re interested. Here’s the link:
    T-Mobile G1 (Unlocked) with extra cool accessories

    I’m daniel.greene on eBay, so check out my stuff!

  • ASL Intro to my new YouTube channel DanielJamesGreene

    A quick ASL introduction to my new channel named after my full name: danieljamesgreene. I used to be azsingersigner, but I decided to transition to a new channel with a username that would be more long-lasting than something that begins with the abbreviation for a state. If you liked my other channel with the videos of singing, ASL signing, closed-captioning, cute pet videos, discussions of linguistics and other commentary, then please move over here to danieljamesgreene and subscribe to my new channel. Thanks for watching, and I look forward to seeing more and more of you. Until then…! 🙂

    P.S. Our new dog’s name is Zoey. Ain’t she sweet?

  • danielgreene is I and I is danieljamesgreene

    I’ve made it a point to secure the usernames danielgreene and danieljamesgreene wherever I can so that I can give people easy URLs to find me on the Web. It would be nicer if I had the same username on all social networks, as Alexandra Samuel does (she can say, “Find me as awsamuel on … Twitter, De.li.cio.us, LinkedIn, Facebook, Flickr, Google, and YouTube), but djgreene is usually not available. In fact, narrowing my usernames down to danielgreene and danieljamesgreene involved several feats of account and profile management. Here’s how I did it.

    The YouTube Story

    Here’s a pair of cross-referenced videos I put on my old and new YouTube accounts as an “I’m moving” subscriber retention campaign, or what I guess some people might call a rebranding campaign.

    This one tells people I’m moving from azsingersigner to danieljamesgreene:

    And this one welcomes people to danieljamesgreene and tells them I’ve moved from azsingersigner:

    azsingersigner on YouTube now has a brother channel at danieljamesgreene on YouTube. I’ll keep azsingersigner because I’ve had it for four years and have received many views, comments, video responses, subscriptions, favorites, on my videos there. It wouldn’t be right to scrub all that. I’ll just start uploading all my new stuff to danieljamesgreene, and make sure all my old subscribers know to subscribe to my new channel. In case you’re wondering why I didn’t get the username danielgreene on YouTube, it’s because that username was secured by someone in Belgium a month after I joined, and nothing has been done with the account since. Oh well. My husband’s name, andysmithers, was also secured around the same time by someone in the United Kingdom, and nothing has been done with that account either. Username squatting, anyone?

    My Usernames on Other Social Networks

    The Facebook Story

    Although it might seem strange that Daniel Greene is danieljamesgreene and Daniel James Greene is danielgreene, there’s a method to the madness. When I first secured my username on June 13, 2009, within the first minute they were available, I picked the name I’d always used. I had barely considered getting a Page, and even if I had a Page, I wouldn’t have been able to secure a username on June 13, 2009 unless I had 1,000 fans by May 31, 2009. When I finally decided to get a Page a few weeks ago, I named it Daniel Greene, which I’ve always gone by professionally. Ironically, I couldn’t secure danielgreene as the username because I had already taken it for my personal profile. So I took the next best thing: danieljamesgreene– my full name including my middle name. But, oops! Now my username for my Page was different from my display name for my Page, and my display name for my profile and Page were the same. It turns out you cannot change your Facebook Page name, but you can change your Facebook profile name. So I changed my Facebook profile display name to Daniel James Greene. Now it’s easier for people to tell the difference between updates from my personal and public accounts. At the same time, I can do the kind of “this is that and that is this” cross-branding that associates one brand with another.

    Name Branding

    I’m a bit loath to talk about my names as brands, but–let’s face it–they are. Everybody’s name is, in some way, their brand. One of the reasons I’ve always used my name as my brand is that I do too many things to brand what I do with a company name. As Daniel Greene, I work as an interpreter for the deaf (sign language interpreter and oral transliterator), interpreter trainer, performing artist, writer, Web author, blogger, vlogger, photographer, and more. I do too many different things to limit myself to a blog or YouTube channel about one thing, and it would be too time consuming to maintain separate media channels for all my various vocations.

    Using the Middle Name

    Daniel James Greene is my full name. There aren’t as many Daniel James Greenes in the world as there are Daniel Greenes, so someday I might have to use my full name as my professional name. For instance, if I joined SAG and there were already a SAG member named Daniel Greene, I would have to join as Daniel James Greene. Likewise, if there are other authors or scholarly writers that use the my first and last name, I might want to use my full name. I plan to go on using the name Daniel Greene as long as I can, but I will use Daniel James Greene when I have to.

    Integrity

    So that’s the story of my usernames danielgreene and danieljamesgreene. I got them so that I could use my first-last and first-middle-last names for social and professional discoverability and recognition. I like to be able to find the people that matter to me, whether as friends or public figures; in return, I like to help people to find me. I also value integrity and consistency, and I believe in having as consistent an identity as possible. Integrity, to me, is doing what I say I’m going to do and being who I say I am. I believe integrity is also about integrating the various aspects of yourself into one. I’m not interested in using the Internet to take on imaginary personas; I just like being me here, and I prefer to do that with as few names as possible and let people know that both names refer to me.

    P.S. I also secured the domain name danieljamesgreene.com and set the URL to resolve to danielgreene.com.