Daniel Greene

Category: Communication

I got my BA in English with a concentration in Communications / Media Study. These posts represent my interest in those fields of study, including: Movies, Television, Websites, Blogging, HTML, CSS, Social Media, etc.

  • Vague Language Facial Expression

    I could really use your help to find one word — and it has to be a NOUN — for this facial expression people use in both English and ASL (American Sign Language) when they’re using Vague Language (VL). Maybe my facial expression / noun pairs will help you. Now maybe you can help me… thanks!

  • Pros and cons of photo sharing on Facebook vs. Flickr

    I’ve been uploading photos to Flickr for over three years and Facebook for over a year, and I’ve been thinking lately about what I like and dislike about each service’s photo sharing functions. Here are my thoughts on Flickr vs. Facebook’s “Photos” application.

    Flickr Advantages:

    • Photograph Data
    • High-Resolution
    • Keywords Tags
    • File Hosting
    • Public Access

    Facebook Advantages:

    • Friend Tagging
    • Click-thru Albums
    • Large Private User Base
    • Simplicity

    Flickr for Photographers; Facebook for Friends

    The way I see it in a nutshell is: Flickr is for photographers; Facebook is for friends. Flickr is a photographer’s paradise. It is full of professional, artistic, high-quality photographs and — unless the photographer prohibits it — photograph data (EXIF & IPTC; i.e., aperture, shutter speed, light sensitivity or ISO speed, etc.) You can learn a lot about how certain effects are achieved by viewing the “More properties” link under the “Taken with a [Camera make-and-model]” link. Yes, of course Flickr is also for amateurs and snapshots. It’s not all art gallery stuff. But where it really shines is in the sharing of the photograph as an art form. Photographers can upload at very high resolutions, and viewers can click the “All Sizes” button above a photo (if the photographer allows it) to see the photo at higher resolutions. Higher resolution images may also be accessed by viewing Slideshows or by browsing Flickr with Cooliris.

    Flickr: Open, Moderated Publishing

    Another advantage of Flickr is its open, public presence on the World Wide Web (which I spelled out to emphasize the “worldwide” part). Photographers and viewers alike can tag photos with verbal keywords, which in turn allows photos to be found in keyword searches within Flickr and even within WWW searches. I have sold several photos that people found on my Flickr photostream through keyword searches. To aid in the worldwide sharing of photos, Flickr allows photographers to moderate and filter content through SafeSearch settings. This means that a photographer posting a photograph of a nude subject can flag that photo “Moderate” or “Restricted” and that photograph will only be visible to viewers who have configured their SafeSearch browsing settings to allow them to see Moderate or Restricted photos.

    Flickr: Hosted, Copyright-filtered Publishing

    Flickr also aids in the worldwide sharing of photos by implementing CreativeCommons labeling and filtering. If I want to restrict the use of a particular photo I post on Flickr, I can label it “all rights reserved.” But if I want to allow people to use it for non-commercial purposes as long as they don’t alter the image and as long as they give me credit, I can label it “Attribution-NoDerivs CreativeCommons.” Finally, another major benefit to photo sharing on Flickr is hosting photos on Flickr for use in web pages elsewhere, such as blogs. I have many photos in my blog, but they are all hosted on Flickr. For those of you who are less tech-savvy, that means that I upload the photo files to Flickr and the images you see on my blog are merely displayed on my blog even though the files reside on a server (file storage space) elsewhere. I also allow people to blog my photos as long as they leave the original photos on Flickr and merely embed image links in their blog pages. So again, Flickr is a great service for the storage and sharing of high-quality photographs.

    Facebook’s Killer Photo App: Tagging Friends

    Facebook, on the other hand, is great for sharing photos of friends with friends. Facebook has a killer feature: the ability to tag your friends in the photos they’re in. When you’re tagging photos, you just click on your friend’s face and begin typing their name in the field that pops up. Facebook auto-completes, so as soon as you see your friend’s name from the list of similar names, you click the check mark next to the name and – voila! – your friend is tagged. Clicking the tag takes you to that friend’s profile page, and on the left sidebar of their profile page, you’ll see a link that reads “Photos of ___.” Clicking on that link takes you, in turn, to a page of all the photos anyone has tagged them in. This great feature allows many different people to post photos of the same person and allows many different people to tag this person in photos, and then Facebook aggregates all these tagged photos of a certain person into one place. Cool!

    Sure, you can add “Notes” to photos in Flickr, and if I’m in a photo, I can add a “Note” to the photo saying “That’s me!” and Flickr will automatically add a link to my photostream. But I can’t add a note to a photo and have it automatically link to someone else’s photostream. And not all my friends are on Flickr; in fact, most of them aren’t. [Update on October 22, 2009: Flickr just added a people-tagging feature.]

    Facebook: All my friends are on it!

    Which brings me to another advantage to photo sharing on Facebook: most of my friends are on it. Chances are, most of your friends are on it too. Now, I can upload a bunch of photos to Flickr and mark them “Private: Friends Only” but that only works for my friends who are on Flickr, which ain’t many! Facebook, on the other hand, is a place where I can upload photos of my friends for my friends to see.

    Case in point: a little over three years ago, I took a bunch of photos of coworkers at a company picnic. I wasn’t sure they’d all want to be on the World Wide Web, so I uploaded them to Flickr, marked them “Private: Friends Only” and send invitations to every one of those coworkers to join Flickr as my friends so they could view the images. Half of them joined Flickr just so they could see the photos. Most of them didn’t leave comments, and none of them (except the two who were already using Flickr) ever used Flickr again, to my knowledge. At least I never saw any photos in their photostream. Three years later, I took a bunch of photos at an Interpreter Appreciation Dinner, and almost every single one of the people at that party was on Facebook! This made it easy to upload all the photos into an album, tag everyone in the photos, and instantly share memories of the event with not only my friends but their friends as well. Now, all the photos I tagged of those people will show up in those people’s Facebook profiles under “Photos of _____.” Yet no one in the rest of the world can see those photos. They are “private” yet they are shared and enjoyed by many friends. Major plus!

    Photos on Facebook: Easy to Post, Easy to View

    Oh, and Facebook is easy to use. You click on the thumbnail size of a photo to see the photo full size (which, on Facebook, is only about 600×400 or 400×600 pixels at most) and then you click on the full-size photo to see the next photo. You can keep your hand in one place, resting your palm on the mouse and click-click-clicking to flip through a whole album of photos. There’s no “Slideshow” widget on Facebook (Flickr has one), but it sure is easy to click through a whole album in a matter of seconds or minutes. Flickr, on the other hand, forces you to click on a little square thumbnail less than an inch in diameter to advance from one photo to the next, and that little thumbnail moves from place to place on your screen depending on the width of the photo on each page and/or the width of photos people embed in the comments they make on those photos. There’s no resting the hand on the desk and click-click-clicking in place with Flickr, no sir! But it still beats Facebook hands down for photo quality and information.

    Speaking of information, though, Facebook makes it easy for me to upload photos when I don’t care as much about quality or information. I know my photos are not going to be seen at high resolution on Facebook, so I don’t have to worry about pixel peepers. And Facebook doesn’t punish me by uploading images without titles the way Flickr does. If I upload without titles on Flickr, my images will be titled “IMG_4087” etc., and if I want them to be “untitled” I have to manually go through and delete every filename. When I don’t care about titling or captioning photos on Facebook, no big deal! Just upload them and Facebook doesn’t insist on titles and captions. (In fact, there really are no “titles” on photos in Facebook; there are only “captions” below the photos if you want to put them there.) I don’t have to worry about tagging my photos on Facebook, either. Of course, that’s also a disadvantage, because it makes it impossible to aggregate your photos by keyword or search photos by keyword, but again, Facebook is about people; Flickr is about photographs. That’s an arguable generalization, but there you have it.

    Flickr and Facebook: Each Has a Place in My Heart

    So what does this all bring me to? How do I use Flickr and Facebook now that I’ve analyzed each service’s photo sharing utilities? Well, I still adore Flickr. I’ve been a Pro member for three years and I just spent another $47.99 to be a Pro member for another two years. I will continue to use Flickr for the sharing and hosting of high-quality images I want to show off to the world and mirror on my blog. I will continue to use Flickr for the sharing and searching of photos by keyword. I will continue to learn from photographers and teach photographers by sharing my photos’ EXIF data and reading the EXIF data on great photos so I can peek into the camera settings used to achieve them. I will continue to geotag my photos on Flickr and look at other geotagged photos so I can teach and learn about this world we live in. (Yeah, I didn’t mention it, but another bummer about Facebook is the lack of geotagging. Oh, well.)

    When I take photos of friends at parties these days, I almost never think of putting them on Flickr. I just put them on Facebook, where almost all my friends are! I tag my friends in photos. Once in a while I’m disappointed when friends untags themselves in photos I’ve posted of them (maybe they thought the photos were unflattering even though I thought they looked great), but more often than not, my friends like my photos such much they make them their buddy icons, at least for a while. It’s nice to know there’s a ready-made user base of friends to share photos privately with. And not just “here’s a photo of you,” which anyone could do with email for the past two decades, but “here’s photos of us all, y’all!” It’s the communal, networked, interconnected sharing of photos which is so much fun on Facebook.

    So, there you have it! Here’s a recap for those who skip to the bottom of things:

    • Public photos on Flickr
    • Private photos on Facebook
    • Keyword-tagged photos on Flickr
    • Friend-tagged photos on Facebook
    • High-quality, high-resolution photos on Flickr
    • High-familiarity, medium-resolution photos on Facebook
    • Photographer’s paradise on Flickr
    • Fun for friends and family on Facebook

    Of course I oversimplified things here. I know all the widgets and twiddles on Facebook and Flickr, but this blog entry was more for me to share my overall perspective than to get into a didactic tutorial about how to use each site. I hope you enjoyed reading this and find it helpful.

    What do YOU think?

    I look forward to hearing from you, either on Facebook or here on my blog. How do use use each service? What are the pros and cons in your experience? Has your use of Flickr changed since the advent of Facebook? Do you ever untag yourself from a photo on Facebook, and if so, why? Do you wish Flickr allowed the tagging of friends? (Who knows… days, weeks, or months after this blog entry is posted, they just might implement it!)[On October 22, 2009: Flickr added a people-tagging feature.]

  • Google Video & YouTube Support Closed-Captioning

    I created this video on October 3, 2006, and at the time, I was one of the first handful of people in the world to publish a video using Google Video’s new closed-captioning implementation. I just found out that YouTube now supports the same method (which makes sense, since they were bought by Google a couple of years ago). Apparently, though, YouTube has been supporting this closed-captioning method since Fall 2008. Who knew? Anyway, since this method of closed-captioning is now supported here, I’m uploading my old Google Video movie with its accompanying closed-caption file so people can view it via the more popular and extensible YouTube.

  • How to get your Flickr photos to show up in your Facebook profile

    [Updated 2/13/12 with current directions.]

    So many of my Facebook / Flickr friends ask me this question, I’m going to blog the answer for the good of whoever wants to know. It’s easy, actually; Flickr will link to your Facebook account and automatically post your latest uploads to your FB profile.

    Just go to your Flick Account Settings and click on the Sharing & Extending tab. See at the bottom of the page? Where you see “Share Flickr photos to other sites,” click “edit” to the right of “Facebook.” If you haven’t connected Flickr to Facebook, click the Connect button. Check “Automatically share your public Flickr uploads anywhere your Facebook updates are shown.” After editing, Facebook should show “Activity Updates: ON.” Link your accounts to share your Flickr updates on Facebook.” When you upload new photos to Flickr, they will automatically be posted to your Facebook profile.

    So, there you have it. That’s how to link your Flickr account to your Facebook account and have your Flickr photos show up in your Facebook profile.

  • Wii and Wii Fit Review: First Impressions

    Wii! It's Mii!

    It’s been over a week since I bought a Wii and just under a week since I bought a Wii Fit. I’d like to share just a few brief first impressions (not a lengthy review but a bulleted list of likes and dislikes).

    Wii: Likes & Dislikes

    • Likes

      • Active, physical involvement in the games

      • Something fun to do with my husband besides the obvious

      • Great fun when friends & family are visiting

      • Opportunities to play over the Internet

      • Internet connectivity for news, weather, etc.

    • Dislikes

      • Graphics at a maximum of 480p with the component cable I was lucky enough to find on sale for $19.99. Not much better than the 480i graphics with the composite cable that came with the Wii. I’m not saying they suck; I’m just saying HD graphics would be preferable.

      • Music is, well… not bad, but it gets old fast. It would be nice if the system and each game would play different music sometimes or have better, less “canned” sounding music.

      • The number of nags you have to click through to do anything. “Remember to wear the wrist strap” Click A. “Make sure there’s enough room around you” Click A. “Hold down the A and B buttons on your remote.” Okay, already!

    Wii Fit Likes & Dislikes

    • Likes
      • Balance board. As a gaming peripheral, it’s a marvelous invention.

      • The ski jump and ski slalom games. I bought the Wii fit mostly for these.

      • Even more exercise than you can get with the Wii alone.

      • Measuring, charting, goal-setting (imperfectly implemented, but good per se).

    • Dislikes
      • Being told I’m overweight when to the world, I’m normal.

      • Not being able to set a BMI goal. The Wii tells me I’m overweight because my BMI is around 25, but it doesn’t let me set a goal for a lower BMI; it only lets me set a goal for a lower weight. At 5’10” and 175#, I don’t really need to lose weight.

      • The number of nags you have to click through to get to anything you want to do. This is even worse that with the Wii in general. There’s all these little fitness tips and cheerful banter you have to click through, such as “Winter’s almost gone, so it’s a good time to take some of the weight off our bellies” and “Good morning! Do you feel refreshed?”

      • The emotional roller coaster of positive and negative feedback it gives you. You make it through the slalom, no matter how badly, and the graphic shows your Mii with its ski poles in the air (Yay!) and the caption says, “Goal!” But the very next thing you see, if you didn’t do a near-perfect run, is your Mii hunched over, panting, drooping, sad-eyed, like a big LOSER! A sore, petulant loser at that. It’s ridiculous. Best to ignore it and enjoy the game. I’m certainly not slumped over like my Mii!

      • A word about step aerobics. I’m a singer with lots of music and dance training. I played tenor drum in a marching band as a teenage. Like Gene Kelly, “I got rhythm.” Now don’t you tell me that my steps are “OK” but not “Perfect” because I don’t keep in step with the other Miis! Urgh! I’m telling you, the movement of the Miis is OUT of step with the music. The only way for me to move ahead and unlock the advanced step aerobics was to step with the other Miis, which felt very dysrhythmical! Can I get an Amen?

    Improving at Wii Fit Slalom!

    Summary

    All right, I know it sounds like I don’t like the Wii Fit because my dislikes were longer rants than my likes. But I really do like it overall. I love the slalom and ski jump. I haven’t actually skied in years (decades), but I love the sense of freedom I get from “skiing” with the Wii Fit. Which brings me to a final “like” which applies greatly to both the Wii and the Wii Fit: the opportunity to play all these different games without having to haul out all this different equipment. The opportunity to jump from playing “virtual” golf, tennis, bowling, baseball, boxing (Wii) and aerobics, yoga, balance games, and strength training (Wii Fit) all in one place with minute changes to the “actual” world must not be underestimated. Think of all the tennis balls you don’t have to go chasing and collecting! It’s no replacement for the real world, but it’s damn cool virtual one.